The United Auto Workers (UAW) strike is in its sixth week and there are reports of a tentative resolution. While the strike itself has damaged the global economy in the short-term, should the UAW secure their negotiation demands, the impact on the U.S. economy and workforce will be even worse.
It’s easy to understand why. The UAW’s first two demands, a 40% wage increase and a shorter work week would make U.S auto manufacturers less productive and less competitive compared to foreign players, weakening a beloved and core U.S. industry.
However, it’s the UAW’s third demand that is most troubling: the elimination of the two-tiered wage system, which would result in everyone in a given role receiving the same compensation, regardless of their experience or time in their position. This demand is fundamentally un-American and would have severe unintended consequences.
Recently, UPS eliminated their two-tiered wage system. If the UAW secures this concession, the auto industry would be the next domino to fall, putting American industry on the perilous path of self-imposed decline.
UNITED AUTO WORKERS STRIKE: COST TO US ECONOMY SETS NEW RECORD
Negotiators need look no further than Communist Mao Zedong’s China in the 1950s and 1960s to see the disastrous economic effects of this policy. Unsurprisingly, Marxists are advising the UAW leadership and pushing for a similar wage system.
Mao’s vision of socialist equality, with uniform wages irrespective of occupation, education or skill level, led to disastrous economic effects and human suffering.
When everyone is paid the same regardless of their performance or skills, the motivation to excel dissipates.
Egalitarian wage policies also resulted in resource misallocation. Wages failed to reflect the actual demand for different types of labor, leading to shortages in some sectors and surpluses in others. Additionally, the rigid wage structure failed to account for varying living costs across regions, distorting labor mobility.
Mao’s egalitarian wage system and other command economic policies led to famine, starvation and the crippling of China’s economy.
China’s subsequent leader Deng Xiaoping viewed economics differently. He introduced market reforms, a stark departure from Mao’s egalitarian model.
Deng focused on fostering competition. His emphasis on incentivizing hard work and innovation through market-based wages, competition and productivity rewards played a pivotal role in China’s transformation. It spurred increased labor productivity, better allocation of human resources, and enhanced geographic labor mobility. A flexible wage structure also made China more attractive to foreign investors.
While Deng’s brutal authoritarianism is inexcusable, he nonetheless propelled China’s economy into a global powerhouse and raised living standards.
The lesson here is clear: incentives and competition fuel productivity and economic growth, while mandated equality leads to economic stagnation.
The UAW needs to reject failed Marxist ideas and focus on equipping American workers to excel. While a rising tide may lift all boats, China’s history reminds us that forced equality kills industry and makes everyone poorer.
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM SEAN DUFFY
Read the full article here
